<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Moozek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moozek.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moozek.com</link>
	<description>Pro Audio &#38; Mixing</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;The Loudness War&#8221;: Oh Please&#8230; by Ferenc Szabo</title>
		<link>http://www.moozek.com/2008/02/03/the-loudness-war-oh-please/#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferenc Szabo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moozek.com/2008/02/03/the-loudness-war-oh-please/#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>Some folks compare the hate of ultra-compressed modern recordings to the way an older generation might have hated rock and roll.  A newer generation comes along and digs it, and can't get into their parent's music.  And they say an even newer generation will dig this ultra-compressed stuff.

But the big difference is that the love/hate of the music way back had to do with a music STYLE (not in any technical method of recording/mastering).  An old fogey might hate Elvis Presley or Black Sabbath or The Clash, regardless of how it was recorded.  

There are some recent recordings that I absolutely can't stand listening to, but I LOVE the music.  Huh??  But what about horrible quality recordings from the past?  Surely they existed before???  Yes... I have some awful sounding cassette recordings of crapily recorded music.   There is so much "wrong" with the sound quality, but I can definitely stand listening to it.  Loud even.  For a long time.  The "badness" of those old recordings just doesn't have the physiological effect of making me turn it down or off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some folks compare the hate of ultra-compressed modern recordings to the way an older generation might have hated rock and roll.  A newer generation comes along and digs it, and can&#8217;t get into their parent&#8217;s music.  And they say an even newer generation will dig this ultra-compressed stuff.</p>
<p>But the big difference is that the love/hate of the music way back had to do with a music STYLE (not in any technical method of recording/mastering).  An old fogey might hate Elvis Presley or Black Sabbath or The Clash, regardless of how it was recorded.  </p>
<p>There are some recent recordings that I absolutely can&#8217;t stand listening to, but I LOVE the music.  Huh??  But what about horrible quality recordings from the past?  Surely they existed before???  Yes&#8230; I have some awful sounding cassette recordings of crapily recorded music.   There is so much &#8220;wrong&#8221; with the sound quality, but I can definitely stand listening to it.  Loud even.  For a long time.  The &#8220;badness&#8221; of those old recordings just doesn&#8217;t have the physiological effect of making me turn it down or off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;The Loudness War&#8221;: Oh Please&#8230; by Ferenc Szabo</title>
		<link>http://www.moozek.com/2008/02/03/the-loudness-war-oh-please/#comment-1731</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferenc Szabo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moozek.com/2008/02/03/the-loudness-war-oh-please/#comment-1731</guid>
		<description>The ironic thing about the modern recordings being "louder" (less dynamic) is they are more often listened to QUIETER exactly because they don't sound good loud.  You can crank up a dynamic heavy rock recording from decade(s) ago and it'll take a lot of volume for it to hurt your ears and be really annoying.  

But a modern ultra-compressed recording will grate the nerves even at modest volumes.  It sounds a bit like listening to FM radio when the station isn't quite tuned in properly... you hear lots of noise.  I know it isn't literally like that, but it comes close in the "annoying" factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ironic thing about the modern recordings being &#8220;louder&#8221; (less dynamic) is they are more often listened to QUIETER exactly because they don&#8217;t sound good loud.  You can crank up a dynamic heavy rock recording from decade(s) ago and it&#8217;ll take a lot of volume for it to hurt your ears and be really annoying.  </p>
<p>But a modern ultra-compressed recording will grate the nerves even at modest volumes.  It sounds a bit like listening to FM radio when the station isn&#8217;t quite tuned in properly&#8230; you hear lots of noise.  I know it isn&#8217;t literally like that, but it comes close in the &#8220;annoying&#8221; factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;The Loudness War&#8221;: Oh Please&#8230; by Murkin</title>
		<link>http://www.moozek.com/2008/02/03/the-loudness-war-oh-please/#comment-1730</link>
		<dc:creator>Murkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moozek.com/2008/02/03/the-loudness-war-oh-please/#comment-1730</guid>
		<description>When I was younger (80's/90's), I would listen to albums. I'd play them over and over, press repeat and leave it in there all day! Over the last ten years or so, that's fallen off. I can't make it through an album anymore. I hear music on the radio that I like, so I buy the album (that's what I was trained to do as a kid -- no downloads back then, and who would buy a CD single?!). But then I can't even make it through the album, even though I like the music... I get a strange impatient twinge inside and find myself skipping ahead, or switching to a different artist.

I had always assumed that this was due to some declining capacity on my part, but I've recently come across this "loudness war" controversy, and a lightbulb has gone off over my head! The symptoms of "ear fatigue" are exactly what I feel when I listen to modern albums. Even though I like the music, I physically/psychologically/whatever-it-is cannot listen to it very long. I've never had the budget for hi-fidelity equipment, so issues like dynamic range are less apparent for me, but the brickwall phenomenon applies on any equipment!

I wish there was an easy way to know whether an album was produced this way... Can anyone recommend any particular forums or blogs that track this issue, album-by-album?

Also, perhaps someone could recommend a method for making CD's that mix music from different eras... It's almost impossible to put them next to each other! I imagine one could simply compress the older music to the same level as the modern music so it holds up in the mix, but then we're back to that issue of "ear fatigue," which if it's not relevant for some, it is relevant for me! :) Is it possible to re-introduce some dynamics to "brickwalled" music? Even just a little bit, so it isn't quite so pulsating and overbearing? There are a lot of tools in Sound Forge, and I hardly understand most of them, even if they're fun to play with!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was younger (80&#8217;s/90&#8217;s), I would listen to albums. I&#8217;d play them over and over, press repeat and leave it in there all day! Over the last ten years or so, that&#8217;s fallen off. I can&#8217;t make it through an album anymore. I hear music on the radio that I like, so I buy the album (that&#8217;s what I was trained to do as a kid &#8212; no downloads back then, and who would buy a CD single?!). But then I can&#8217;t even make it through the album, even though I like the music&#8230; I get a strange impatient twinge inside and find myself skipping ahead, or switching to a different artist.</p>
<p>I had always assumed that this was due to some declining capacity on my part, but I&#8217;ve recently come across this &#8220;loudness war&#8221; controversy, and a lightbulb has gone off over my head! The symptoms of &#8220;ear fatigue&#8221; are exactly what I feel when I listen to modern albums. Even though I like the music, I physically/psychologically/whatever-it-is cannot listen to it very long. I&#8217;ve never had the budget for hi-fidelity equipment, so issues like dynamic range are less apparent for me, but the brickwall phenomenon applies on any equipment!</p>
<p>I wish there was an easy way to know whether an album was produced this way&#8230; Can anyone recommend any particular forums or blogs that track this issue, album-by-album?</p>
<p>Also, perhaps someone could recommend a method for making CD&#8217;s that mix music from different eras&#8230; It&#8217;s almost impossible to put them next to each other! I imagine one could simply compress the older music to the same level as the modern music so it holds up in the mix, but then we&#8217;re back to that issue of &#8220;ear fatigue,&#8221; which if it&#8217;s not relevant for some, it is relevant for me! <img src='http://www.moozek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Is it possible to re-introduce some dynamics to &#8220;brickwalled&#8221; music? Even just a little bit, so it isn&#8217;t quite so pulsating and overbearing? There are a lot of tools in Sound Forge, and I hardly understand most of them, even if they&#8217;re fun to play with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Super Review: Yamaha HS50M - The new NS-10M? by Sergey</title>
		<link>http://www.moozek.com/2008/01/09/super-review-yamaha-hs50m-the-new-ns-10m/#comment-1729</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moozek.com/?p=28#comment-1729</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for this article, Jonathan! I read lots of reviews on different monitors, but your one is so inspiring and well argumented that I'm now a happy owner of HS50M's. Although still a beginner, I can already see that my mixes will improve dramatically with these (and that's after just 1 day of use).
Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for this article, Jonathan! I read lots of reviews on different monitors, but your one is so inspiring and well argumented that I&#8217;m now a happy owner of HS50M&#8217;s. Although still a beginner, I can already see that my mixes will improve dramatically with these (and that&#8217;s after just 1 day of use).<br />
Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 Pro Tools Tips for the Newbie by DirrGoldenschlaggwer</title>
		<link>http://www.moozek.com/2008/08/18/10-pro-tools-tips-for-the-newbie/#comment-1727</link>
		<dc:creator>DirrGoldenschlaggwer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moozek.com/?p=137#comment-1727</guid>
		<description>zapping P ram is another good cleaning process even if I don't quite understand what is happening. Do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zapping P ram is another good cleaning process even if I don&#8217;t quite understand what is happening. Do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Definitive Guide to Windows XP Tweaking for Audio by Lacklogic</title>
		<link>http://www.moozek.com/2008/08/21/definite-guide-to-windows-xp-tweaking-for-audio/#comment-1726</link>
		<dc:creator>Lacklogic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 21:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moozek.com/?p=193#comment-1726</guid>
		<description>Jonathan,  Great tips. Thank you for the wonderful post for everyone to benefit...  Are you using Win 7 yet?  Do you have any tips for DAW users who want to tweak windows 7 for performance?

I use Cubase 5 and I am considering going to SSD drives, but I have been reading alot of different ideas on how to use the SSD optimally on the system.  As primary drives, or as a secondary drive?  Move certain system folders over to the SSD (if it is used as a secondary system drive) such as Program Files and your VST folder...   and keep a primary on a traditional HD?  Alot of idea floating around and I wondered if you had any input on the subject.

Thanks!

SRW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,  Great tips. Thank you for the wonderful post for everyone to benefit&#8230;  Are you using Win 7 yet?  Do you have any tips for DAW users who want to tweak windows 7 for performance?</p>
<p>I use Cubase 5 and I am considering going to SSD drives, but I have been reading alot of different ideas on how to use the SSD optimally on the system.  As primary drives, or as a secondary drive?  Move certain system folders over to the SSD (if it is used as a secondary system drive) such as Program Files and your VST folder&#8230;   and keep a primary on a traditional HD?  Alot of idea floating around and I wondered if you had any input on the subject.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>SRW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 Most Inspiring Movie Soundtracks of Recent Times by Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.moozek.com/2008/08/30/top-10-most-inspiring-movie-soundtracks-of-recent-times/#comment-1725</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moozek.com/?p=287#comment-1725</guid>
		<description>There Will Be Blood, perfect choices in scenes, sarcastically chosen bright major triumphant music in the face of pure evil from the movies main character.  Watch it and try to get the violin out of your head by the end of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There Will Be Blood, perfect choices in scenes, sarcastically chosen bright major triumphant music in the face of pure evil from the movies main character.  Watch it and try to get the violin out of your head by the end of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Super Review: Yamaha HS50M - The new NS-10M? by Ariel</title>
		<link>http://www.moozek.com/2008/01/09/super-review-yamaha-hs50m-the-new-ns-10m/#comment-1724</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 01:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moozek.com/?p=28#comment-1724</guid>
		<description>Hi Vlear and Dorian, I recently bought a pair of these and I have your same problem. The tweeters emits a sort of annoying white noise constantly even there is no cable plugged-in. I see it is a common problem. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vlear and Dorian, I recently bought a pair of these and I have your same problem. The tweeters emits a sort of annoying white noise constantly even there is no cable plugged-in. I see it is a common problem. <img src='http://www.moozek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Super Review: Yamaha HS50M - The new NS-10M? by Dorian</title>
		<link>http://www.moozek.com/2008/01/09/super-review-yamaha-hs50m-the-new-ns-10m/#comment-1720</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moozek.com/?p=28#comment-1720</guid>
		<description>Hi vlear.
I have exactly the same problem with the noise.
I send a few e-mails to many services and i'm still waiting.

I wonder other don't hear this or had PC/MAC in the same room and everything is normal because PC emit own noise:)
Maybe our HS50M have a problem or overall AMP in HS50M emit static white noise which is especialy disturbing in tweeter and people don't listen it:)

We have to check other pair of Yamaha HS50M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi vlear.<br />
I have exactly the same problem with the noise.<br />
I send a few e-mails to many services and i&#8217;m still waiting.</p>
<p>I wonder other don&#8217;t hear this or had PC/MAC in the same room and everything is normal because PC emit own noise:)<br />
Maybe our HS50M have a problem or overall AMP in HS50M emit static white noise which is especialy disturbing in tweeter and people don&#8217;t listen it:)</p>
<p>We have to check other pair of Yamaha HS50M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Waves Guitar Tool Rack 3 vs. IK Multimedia Amplitube 2 by Jonathan Trengrove</title>
		<link>http://www.moozek.com/2007/10/26/waves-gtr-3-vs-ik-multimedia-amplitube-2/#comment-1719</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Trengrove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moozek.com/?p=11#comment-1719</guid>
		<description>I would say I've found the Waves GTR to sound very full with the right brickwall limiting to make it really loud. That combined with multiple amps, and some stereo widening and it can sound much thicker and better than Amplitube 2. Although it can be noisier, but a good gate or well edited audio will fix that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say I&#8217;ve found the Waves GTR to sound very full with the right brickwall limiting to make it really loud. That combined with multiple amps, and some stereo widening and it can sound much thicker and better than Amplitube 2. Although it can be noisier, but a good gate or well edited audio will fix that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
